Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4324
Title: Sport perfectionism and risk factors of sport injury rehabilitation overadherence
Authors: MacWilliam, Kristi
Keywords: Perfectionism and overstriving (Sport);Rehabilitation overadherence;Sport injury
Issue Date: 2018
Abstract: Rehabilitation overadherence is a form of nonadherence in which individuals exceed practitioners’ guidelines regarding the rehabilitation of their injury, resulting in enhanced risk for re-injury and prolonged recovery (Granquist, Podlog, Engel, & Newland, 2014). Overadherence is common among overly-motivated injured athletes with intense personalities (Niven, 2007). This suggests that perfectionism may be a factor that puts injured athletes at a greater risk of rehabilitation overadherence. This study utilized the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism (Gaudreau & Thomspon, 2010) to investigate this claim. Injured athletes (N = 82; Mage = 27.45 years, SD = 10.88) currently undergoing supervised rehabilitation completed measures of two perfectionism dimensions (personal standards and evaluative concerns) and four overadherence risk factors (Effortful Healing, Expedited Rehabilitation, Inclinations to Overadhere, and Normalization of pain). A series of multiple regression analyses tested whether the perfectionism dimensions interacted to predict each overadherence risk factor. No significant effects were found for Effortful Healing and Expedited Rehabilitation. A significant main effect (b = 0.17) indicated that higher levels of evaluative concerns predicted greater Inclinations to Overadhere. A significant interaction effect (b = -0.07) identified a similar relationship between evaluative concerns and Normalization of Pain, but specified that this relationship was greatest when personal standards were low. Findings are interpreted in line with the 2 × 2 model’s hypotheses and identified initial evidence of the associations between perfectionism and sport injury rehabilitation overadherence. The discussion speculates as to why relationships were evident for some overadherence risk factors, but not others, elaborates on the role of evaluative concerns perfectionism in overadherence, and suggests practical implications for practitioners.
URI: http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4324
metadata.etd.degree.discipline: Kinesiology
metadata.etd.degree.name: Master of Science
metadata.etd.degree.level: Master
metadata.dc.contributor.advisor: Gotwals, John
metadata.dc.contributor.committeemember: Sanzo, Paola
Smith, Leanne
Appears in Collections:Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MacWilliamK2018m-1a.pdf12.73 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.