Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4588
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWilson, Will-
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Amelie-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T13:08:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-28T13:08:54Z-
dc.date.created2020-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4588-
dc.description.abstractThis is a comparison between the sustainable management plans of the Menominee Forest and Algonquin Provincial Park. The importance of this thesis is to underline the importance of the attaining the most sustainable means of management with impending climate change. The comparison is a comprehensive way to lay out information and make decisions based on facts. This comparison is based on the state of the historic forest versus the current day forest, which is further sub-divided into vegetation, wildlife, soils, and productivity. Another topic that is discussed is the impact of indigenous involvement on management. The conclusion of the discussion based on those factors mentioned above, is that the Menominee Forest is the more sustainable of the two.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMenominee Foresten_US
dc.subjectAlgonquin Provincial Parken_US
dc.subjectIndigenous involvement on managementen_US
dc.subjectSustainable practices for forestryen_US
dc.subjectSustainable management plans (forestry)en_US
dc.titleA comparison between the sustainable management plans: The Menominee Forest vs. Algonquin Provincial Parken_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
etd.degree.nameHonours Bachelor of Science in Forestryen_US
etd.degree.levelBacheloren_US
etd.degree.disciplineNatural Resources Managementen_US
etd.degree.grantorLakehead Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:Undergraduate theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RobertsonA2020b-1a.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.