Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/783
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvan den Berg, Herman Anthony-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-21T14:57:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-21T14:57:34Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Knowledge Management, 17:2 (2013), 159-174en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/783-
dc.descriptionThis is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of knowledge management. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of knowledge management, 17, 2 (2013) http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315141en_US
dc.description.abstractThe author proposes that for management purposes organizational knowledge, as the paramount input to all production processes, be considered in three separate classifications, tacit, codified, and encapsulated. While the bulk of previous knowledge management theory has generally focused on tacit and codified or explicit knowledge, this paper contributes to the theory by drawing attention to the often under investigated third classification, encapsulated knowledge.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjecteconomic theoryen_US
dc.subjectknowledge managementen_US
dc.subjectknowledge-based view (KVB)en_US
dc.titleThree shapes of organizational knowledgeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Business Administration

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
vandenBerg20132b.pdf310.56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.