Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/897
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorO'Connor, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLarizza-Savas, Antoinette
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-05T13:35:17Z
dc.date.available2017-06-05T13:35:17Z
dc.date.created1994
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/897
dc.description.abstractCan patterns or redundancies be identified in the sequences of behaviors that are exchanged between individuals in social interactions? The present study directly examined the most controversial form of complementarity: whether dominant behaviors are followed by submissive behaviors, and whether submissive behaviors are followed by dominant behaviors. We were specifically concerned with recent claims that complementarity on the dominant - submissive axis does not exist, and that dominant - submissive behavior is instead the result of personality tendencies. Clear evidence was found for complementarity in relational control behaviors utilizing appropriate aggregated and sequential analyses. However, there was also an unexpected tendency for dominance to evoke further dominant behaviors. Individual difference tendencies were correlated with relational control behaviors, but not as strongly or consistently as predicted.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectSocial interaction
dc.subjectInterpersonal relations
dc.titleTest of personality and complementarity in dyadic interactions using sequential analyses
dc.typeThesis
etd.degree.nameMaster of Arts
etd.degree.levelMaster
etd.degree.disciplinePsychology
etd.degree.grantorLakehead University
Appears in Collections:Retrospective theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LarizzaSavasA1994m-1b.pdf2.13 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.