Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWiersma, Elaine C.
dc.contributor.authorJoza, Julia Ann
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-01T20:15:02Z
dc.date.available2013-02-01T20:15:02Z
dc.date.created2012
dc.date.issued2013-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/383
dc.description.abstractPublic health professionals experience dilemmas in their everyday work and many of these dilemmas are challenges where they must find the most ethical way to manage the situation. How these dilemmas are approached, negotiated, and resolved is an area that has been given little attention in the literature and in the Canadian public health system. This paper describes the everyday ethical dilemmas experienced by public health professionals working in two publicly funded health units along with the mechanisms they used to negotiate and resolve these challenges. Using grounded theory this thesis also outlines the approaches used by these public health professionals to manage the everyday ethical dilemmas they experienced in practice. The findings may provide guidance for other public health professionals who are faced with making challenging decisions concerning everyday ethical dilemmas experienced in practice.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectEveryday ethicsen_US
dc.subjectGrounded theoryen_US
dc.titleA Grounded Theory Study of the Approaches and Mechanisms Used in Public Health Practice for Everyday Ethical Dilemma Negotiation and Resolutionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
etd.degree.nameM.P.H.en_US
etd.degree.levelMasteren_US
etd.degree.disciplinePublic Healthen_US
etd.degree.grantorLakehead Universityen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKatolik, Jaro


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record