Lakehead University Library Logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Knowledge Commons
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Undergraduate theses
    • View Item
    •   Knowledge Commons
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Undergraduate theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    quick search

    Browse

    All of Knowledge CommonsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDisciplineAdvisorCommittee MemberThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDisciplineAdvisorCommittee Member

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Differential treatment of boreal forest biome by forest stewardship council

    Thumbnail

    View/Open

    KhanlarovN2017b-1b.pdf (3.056Mb)

    Date

    2017

    Author

    Khanlarov, Nazim

    Degree

    Honours Bachelor of Science in Forestry

    Discipline

    Natural Resources Management

    Subject

    Forest Stewardship Council
    FSC certification
    Certification of forestry practices
    Boreal forest biome

    Metadata

    Show full item record

    Abstract

    This thesis examines the conduct of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) regarding the certification stringency in the boreal biome. Certification is less stringent in Russia as compared to other boreal nations; Canada, Sweden, Norway and Finland. Further, it will elaborate on Motion 65 by FSC on how it relates to the main topic. According to recent studies, FSC certification auditing is less thorough in Russia as compared to Canada and Nordic Countries. In Canada and Nordic countries, FSC is a very stringent and scrupulous body, making certificate holders work hard to keep their status. In 2014, FSC has released its Motion 65 to protect Intact Forest Landscapes, and a set of recommendations followed in late 2016. If approved, Motion 65 would unequally affect Canada and Nordic Countries as compared to Russia. Forest Code of the Russian Federation does not recognize IFLs, which are key principle of Motion 65. This thesis concluded that part of the problem is that while forestry regulations of Canada and Nordic countries are in tandem with FSC guidelines, Russia’s laws conflict with them. Another part of the issue is lack of equity distribution in Russia as compared to Canada and Nordic Countries. The thesis suggests that FSC needs to develop a strategy specifically tailored to Russia, in order to achieve levels of compliance and socioeconomic equity similar to Canada and Nordic Countries.

    URI

    http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4414

    Collections

    • Undergraduate theses

    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     


    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback