Lakehead University Library Logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Knowledge Commons Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    •   Knowledge Commons Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    quick search

    Browse

    All of Knowledge CommonsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDisciplineAdvisorCommittee MemberThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDisciplineAdvisorCommittee Member

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Examining the “sadder but wiser” paradox: are those high in dispositional self-reflection likely to journal, and do they benefit?

    Thumbnail

    View/Open

    MacIsaacA2020m-1a.pdf (1.199Mb)

    Date

    2020

    Author

    MacIsaac, Angela

    Degree

    Master of Arts

    Discipline

    Psychology : Clinical

    Subject

    Self-reflection
    Journaling
    Psychological well-being
    Mental health

    Metadata

    Show full item record

    Abstract

    Self-reflection is the tendency to reflect on one’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviours. It has a strong foundation in psychology for conferring self-knowledge and self-awareness. Journaling is an example of an activity that requires much self-reflection, and as an intervention has positive effects on mood, wellbeing, and the ability to proactively ward off stress. Paradoxically, however, self-reflection may also be associated with mental health symptoms, possibly through its relationship with rumination. Gaps exist in the literature as to whether self-reflection predicts one’s choice to journal, as well as whether self-reflection affects the extent to which journaling confers benefit. In the current study, participants (N = 152) had access to a smartphone app with various features, including a journal. They were encouraged to use the app throughout a 28-day period, choosing which features to use and for how long, and completed self-report measures at baseline, midpoint, and post-app periods. I hypothesized baseline self-reflection would predict journal usage, and that self-reflection would affect the extent to which journaling was associated with improvement in affect, self-regulation, and psychological wellbeing. Unexpectedly, using count regression models, self-reflection did not predict journal usage, though both rumination and keeping a journal outside of the study predicted the choice to journal. Multilevel models also revealed that, as expected, time spent journaling was associated with lower negative affect and higher self-regulation and psychological wellbeing over time, though some of these effects were diminished when accounting for time spent using other app features. Further, as hypothesized, higher baseline self-reflection was associated with greater improvement in psychological wellbeing the more one journaled, even when controlling for rumination. Findings highlight the benefit of journaling to promote wellbeing when self-reflection is high, although those higher in rumination may be more likely to engage in the behaviour to begin with.

    URI

    http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca:7070/handle/2453/4705

    Collections

    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009

    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     


    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback