Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStroink, Mirella
dc.contributor.authorAlmuhtadi, Karin
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-07T21:44:38Z
dc.date.available2021-01-07T21:44:38Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4732
dc.description.abstractResearchers have discovered that the world is composed of panarchies of complex adaptive systems. This approach acknowledges the existence of non-linear relationships and emerging patterns among nested systems. Systems exist on varying interacting scales including at the level of the individual, among groups, societies and ecologies. Complexity theorists have identified a four-phased process, the adaptive cycle, which can help us understand how complex adaptive systems change. The adaptive cycle typically involves the system shifting from initial growth, to increased structure and efficiency at the cost of resilience, followed by shock, release, and reorganization. This process has been identified in various types of systems and across disciplines, but complexity theory has not informed understanding of couple dynamics or the processing of attachment injuries. Attachment injuries are critical moments in close relationships that can influence how we view ourselves, others, and the world. In Study 1, 15 community members spoke about their lived experience with attachment injuries. In Study 2, eight participants familiar with complexity theory shared their views on the connections between complexity and couple relationships. The two groups recruited reflect an effort to explore attachment and complexity from two unique angles. The studies were conducted in parallel, rather than sequentially. A qualitative approach was identified as most appropriate since this intersection in research has not been explored. Data analysis was iterative, conceptually- and data-driven, and informed by thematic analysis, in order to identify emerging themes. Study 1 themes were: (a) context of injury, (b) impact of injury, (c) impact on and role of beliefs, (d) attachment processes, and (e) release and reorganization. Study 2 themes included: (a) uncertainty, and (b) perceived positives of adopting a complexity lens. Conceptualizing relationships and attachment as complex systems, directions for future research, and considerations for psychologists, are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAdult attachmenten_US
dc.subjectAttachment injuriesen_US
dc.titleCan complex adaptive systems theory contribute to understanding attachment injuries in adult relationships? A qualitative approachen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
etd.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
etd.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
etd.degree.disciplinePsychology : Clinicalen_US
etd.degree.grantorLakehead Universityen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record