| dc.description.abstract | In Canada, staggering rates of household food insecurity are emblematic of broader issues, such
as systemic discrimination, poverty, and a global, capitalist food system. The means to address
food insecurity are contested within the nation. For example, community-based programs (e.g.,
food banks), continue to be common, despite concerns that they may induce shame and guilt in
those who access them and fail to address the root causes of the issue. Despite this, some authors
have argued that such spaces may offer transformational potential to bring community members
together in-common across class divides in the meantime. Limited research exists on the
experiences of frontline food security service providers, and more specifically on how they
conceptualize their work. In this thesis, semi-structured interviews and photovoice were used,
following an interpretive phenomenological design. Specifically, I sought to explore how
frontline food security service providers in Thunder Bay experienced their work, and the
interactions between their intrapsychic factors and processes, organizational practices and their
visions for the future of their work. Three superordinate themes emerged, demonstrating that
participants were thinking about broad issues (e.g., poverty, racism), found tensions in the role of
lived experience (e.g., as both a motivation to come to the work and a risk factor for burnout),
and saw their role as care work underscored by shared values. The findings also highlight the
importance of an interactional approach, exploring how an individual's early life experiences,
values and sense of self, alongside organizational factors and others in the field, worked in
concert to create their experience. While this work does not intend to make broad claims about
the experience of all food security service providers, it highlights some of the voices in Thunder
Bay, Ontario, and the opportunities they have in transforming food access to be more just and
equitable for all. | en_US |
