Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTocheri, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T14:31:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T14:31:00Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/5237
dc.description.abstractThe face of Homo floresiensis has been described as small in absolute and relative size, comparable to the condition observed in modern humans (Homo sapiens). It has even been claimed that LB1’s relative facial dimensions are broadly similar to other fossil hominin crania that have extremely small faces in relation to their cranial vaults, such as Asian Homo erectus and the Dali cranium. The idea that LB1 shares a proportionately small face with some but not all species in the genus Homo is a key component of the hypothesis that Homo floresiensis is an island-dwarfed descendant of Asian Homo erectus. Here I test two specific questions in terms of the relative external size/shape of LB 1’s facial skeleton. First, can LB 1’s relative facial size and shape be accommodated within the ranges of variation for a worldwide sample of normal, nonpathological, modern humans? [...]en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectHomo floresiensisen_US
dc.subjectHominin evolutionen_US
dc.titleThe face of Homo floresiensis: an investigation of scaleen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
etd.degree.nameMaster of Scienceen_US
etd.degree.levelMasteren_US
etd.degree.disciplineArchaeological Scienceen_US
etd.degree.grantorLakehead Universityen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberVarney, Tamara


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record