Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuckai, Nancy J
dc.contributor.authorNeufeld, Breanne
dc.contributor.authorMorris, David
dc.contributor.authorReid, Douglas E.B.
dc.contributor.authorBell, F. Wayne
dc.contributor.authorChander, Shahi
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, W. Lense
dc.contributor.authorAdhikary, Shailendra
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-28T15:11:07Z
dc.date.available2016-10-28T15:11:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationThe Forestry Chronicle, 2014, 90(1): 70-79, http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc2014-012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc2014-012
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/792
dc.descriptionThis is the publisher’s version of a work published in The Forestry Chronicle 90:1 (2014) The version on the publisher's website can be viewed at http://pubs.cif-ifc.org/doi/abs/10.5558/tfc2014-012en_US
dc.description.abstractA 20-year-old experimental white spruce plantation was used to identify key stand (neighbourhood competition) and soil (physical and chemical properties) factors influencing spruce growth (Periodic Basal Area Increment) and foliar nutrients. Total and species-specific competition was estimated using Hegyi’s distance-dependent index for 39 individual spruce trees. Twelve trees, covering the range of total HCI (2 to 8) and aspen competition (0% to >75%), were selected for repeated (May through October) foliar sampling. Spruce PBAI declined approximately 10% for each additional unit of total HCI; species did not significantly affect this decline. Increasing aspen presence significantly influenced spruce foliar N (1.17% to 1.31%), P (0.15% to 0.23%), and K (0.68% to 0.88%), but led to declines in Ca (0.81% to 0.48%). Multiple linear regression indicated that soil carbon (partial r2 = 0.386) and available soil moisture (partial r2 = 0.131) together explained more of the variation in spruce growth than did competition factors alone (partial r2 = 0.251). The results suggest that, at this stage of stand development, precommercial thinning operations should focus on density control and inter-tree spacing, while retaining an aspen component resulting in well-spaced, free-growing mixed stands of white spruce and aspen.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectFallingsnow Ecosystem Projecten_US
dc.subjectfoliar nutrientsen_US
dc.subjectTrembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.)en_US
dc.subjectWhite spruce (Picea glauca [Moench.] Voss)en_US
dc.titleThe influence of competition and species mixture on plantation-grown white spruce: Growth and foliar nutrient response after 20 yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Faculty of Natural Resources Management [9]
    Natural resources management is stewardship of both public and private primarily (mainly) forested landscapes, with the intension of reaching a balance of ecological sustainability, economic viability and societal acceptance of prescribed land use.

Show simple item record