Computational investigations on hydrodynamic performance of active and passive tails for carangiform swimmers
Loading...
Date
Authors
Nayak, Dev Pradeepkumar
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Fish achieve efficient propulsion through their unique capabilities to undulate their bodies for
locomotion, and carangiform swimmers are often associated with producing thrust from their rear
through their caudal fin. The undulatory kinematics of the caudal fin closely resemble flapping-like
behavior composed of heaving and pitching. In this study, we investigate the interaction between
the caudal fin and the rest of the swimmer’s body through numerical simulations of fluid–structure
interaction, segregated into a Two-dimensional and a Three-dimensional study. In the first part,
the body and tail are modeled with NACA=0015 and NACA-0012, respectively, at two Reynolds
Numbers, 500 and 5000, corresponding to a small and a large fish. The passive pitching of the
tail is modeled with a linear torsional spring and a damper at its peduncle. This analysis reveals
that a swimmer with a passive pitching tail does not necessarily produce higher thrust compared
to its active counterpart but can achieve higher power savings. It also shows that smaller fishes
can benefit from a passively pitching tail, whereas larger fishes require an actively pitching tail for
optimal performance. In the second part, we extend the work to a three dimensional analysis with
an actual model of a Jackfish, where we separate the caudal fin from the swimmer and examine the
performance of passively pitching versus active pitching. Here, the passive pitching is modeled
with a nonlinear spring to incorporate the stabilizing effect at larger amplitudes, and the study
is conducted at a Reynolds Number of 3000. We find that the nonlinear spring enables larger
amplitude pitching and that the passively pitching tail produces higher thrust than the actively
pitching tail. Overall, the study shows that a nonlinear spring is essential for enforcing large
amplitude pitching of the caudal fin which benefits the swimmer to generate higher thrust, while
with a linear spring and smaller pitching amplitudes, locomotion involves a trade-off where the swimmer prioritizes thrust production or power savings.
