Effects of two training methods on flexibility

dc.contributor.advisorRushall, Brent S.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Andrew Allan
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-06T13:40:16Z
dc.date.available2017-06-06T13:40:16Z
dc.date.created1977
dc.date.issued1977
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two different flexibility training methods, 3S (Scientific Stretching for Sport) and SS (Slow Active Stretching). Warmup effects, differential joint responses, and the standardization of training procedures were controlled. Ss were 12 school girl basketball players, aged 12 to 1A. The research design consisted of four replications of a 3x3 Graeco-Latin square. Ss were assessed for flexibility at the beginning of a six week flexibility training program, at the conclusion of training and then after two two-week retention periods. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Orthogonal Comparisons. Significance was determined at 0.05 level. Results showed: 1) flexibility training methods (3S and SS) improved flexibility, 2) the shoulder joint acquired more flexibility than either the knee or ankle joint, 3) neither flexibility training method was superior to the other, 4) within two weeks of training cessation, both 3S and SS effects were lost to a significant degree when compared to control effects. 5) after two weeks of training cessation, there was no difference between changes of the control and two training groups, and 6) there was no difference in loss of flexibility between the shoulder, the knee and ankle joints.
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/2292
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectPhysical education and training
dc.titleEffects of two training methods on flexibility
dc.typeThesis
etd.degree.disciplineKinesiology
etd.degree.grantorLakehead University
etd.degree.levelMaster
etd.degree.nameMaster of Science

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TurnerA1977m-1b.pdf
Size:
6.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format