Lakehead University Library Logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Knowledge Commons
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    •   Knowledge Commons
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    quick search

    Browse

    All of Knowledge CommonsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDisciplineAdvisorCommittee MemberThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDisciplineAdvisorCommittee Member

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Gambling, gaming, and loot boxes: converging irrational beliefs?

    Thumbnail

    View/Open

    PuirasE2021m-1a.pdf (718.3Kb)

    Date

    2021

    Author

    Puiras, Erika

    Degree

    Master of Arts

    Discipline

    Psychology : Clinical

    Subject

    Gambling
    Gaming
    Gambling-related cognitions
    Internet gaming disorder
    Loot boxes (gambling and gaming behaviours)

    Metadata

    Show full item record

    Abstract

    The current study examined whether engaging with loot boxes (i.e., in-game “boxes” that can be won within a game or purchased with in-game currency or real money, and which contain a random selection of prizes or objects) was associated with increased endorsement of gamblingrelated cognitions around luck and chance (i.e., controlling the outcome of a chance game) that have been observed in gamblers. Socializing was also proposed to act a mediator between irrational cognitions and loot box use. Further, self-generated motives to engage with or refrain from gambling, gaming, and loot box content were also examined. University students (n = 321) and community participants (n = 279) completed a battery of online questionnaires that included measures of problem gambling (i.e., Problem Gambling Severity Index), gambling-related cognitions (i.e., GamCog, Belief in Good Luck Scale), problem gaming (i.e., Internet Gaming Disorder Scale), and risky loot box engagement (i.e., Risky Loot Box Index). Quantitative analyses, including a one-way ANOVA on gambling-related cognitions (e.g., luck), indicated that gamblers had higher scores than loot box users on a measure of gambling-related cognitions, but that these results were likely statistically but not clinically significant. No evidence for socializing as a mediator was found. Qualitative content analysis identified several overlapping motives to engage or refrain from engaging with gambling, gaming, and loot box content. For example, the chance to win was identified as a motive to engage with both gambling and loot box content. Additional exploratory analyses revealed that loot box use is linked to problem gambling and gaming. Overall, these findings provide further context and insight into the burgeoning research on loot boxes, their relation to gambling and gaming behaviours in terms of gambling-related cognitions (e.g., luck) and problematic behaviour (e.g., problem gambling, problem gaming), as well as motives to engage with or refrain from such content.

    URI

    https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4856

    Collections

    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009

    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     


    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback