Lakehead University Library Logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Knowledge Commons Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    •   Knowledge Commons Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    quick search

    Browse

    All of Knowledge CommonsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDisciplineAdvisorCommittee MemberThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDisciplineAdvisorCommittee Member

    My Account

    Login

    Does mental illness stigma differ across disorders? An investigation of public stigma and attribution theory in social anxiety disorder, depression & schizophrenia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    DabasG2021m-1a.pdf (453.6Kb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Dabas, Grishma
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Individuals experiencing mental illness face numerous negative social, economic, and personal outcomes, partly due to the public stigma around mental illness. Attribution theory posits that stigma occurs when publicly held stereotypes of individuals with mental illness elicit negative emotions, eventually resulting in discriminatory behaviours. The stigma associated with common mental disorders is not well understood, especially in the context of attribution theory. The current study aimed to address these gaps through an online survey of undergraduate students’ (n = 302) perceptions of the public’s stigmatizing attitudes, emotions, and behaviours towards an individual depicted as having social anxiety disorder (SAD), depression (DEP) or schizophrenia (SCH). Differences were identified in how strongly specific stigma components were endorsed: SAD and DEP were associated with greater Weak-not-Sick (WNS) attitudes and intentions to help compared to SCH; DEP had the highest blame ratings; SCH had the highest pity ratings; SAD had the lowest avoidance ratings and SCH had the highest. Further, hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that WNS and blame attitudes were a unique predictor of negative affective reactions for SAD and DEP respectively. Dangerousness predicted negative affect for all three disorders. Fear and anger predicted discriminatory behaviours for SAD and DEP, while fear and pity were predictors for SCH. These findings partially supported study hypotheses. Additional exploratory regressions were conducted to identify predictors of pity, help and avoidance. Results from this research suggests that the stigma associated with mental illness is best understood by examining disorder categories individually. Findings can inform the development of effective anti-stigma strategies to improve outcomes for those living with mental illness.
    URI
    https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4861
    Collections
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009 [1638]

    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     


    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback