Lakehead University Library Logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Knowledge Commons Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    •   Knowledge Commons Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    quick search

    Browse

    All of Knowledge CommonsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDisciplineAdvisorCommittee MemberThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDisciplineAdvisorCommittee Member

    My Account

    Login

    Identification of cracks in pipelines based on machine learning and deep learning

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    HeJ2022m-1a.pdf (1.286Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Author
    He, Jinchen
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Pipelines are important long-distance transportation structures in modern industry, and because many are buried deep underground, pipeline health monitoring is critical to industry; however, inspecting underground pipelines can be quite challenging due to the large financial and human resources required. For decades, different methods have been used to assess pipeline cracks. Ultrasonic quantitative nondestructive testing (QNDT) is one of the frequently used methods in pipeline health monitoring. In the current study, the coefficients of the reflected and transmitted waves due to different incident waves were first generated by using a semi-analytical finite element method based on classical elasticity theory. In that study, different types of pipes, including different geometries and materials, were considered. Then four different regression machine learning algorithms and three deep learning algorithms were used to identify crack features. In this study, the prediction accuracy was compared between the different algorithms and different datasets. The objective was to find the algorithm with the highest prediction rate and to select a suitable dataset for prediction. It was found that the extremely randomized tree (ERT) algorithm was the best in identifying cracks in the pipeline. The prediction accuracy will be improved by selecting different data sets. In addition, all algorithms performed better in predicting the radial crack depth (CDRD) than predicting the circumferential crack width (CWCD).
    URI
    https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/5081
    Collections
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009 [1409]

    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     


    Lakehead University Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback